Debate: Collaborative Environmental Law: Pro and Con
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Poking Lawyers and Politicians
A report on the 5th Internet, Law and Politics conference hosted by the UOC in July 2009. The author, who attended the conference as rapporteur and wrote a ‘live blog’ during the two-day event, reviews some of the contributions, reflects on the theme of social networking sites (‘pro or con?’) and explores the different approaches of the disciplines of law and of political science, suggesting th...
متن کاملPirfenidone for IPF: pro/con debate; the 'con' viewpoint.
Improving outcomes for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains a major unmet healthcare need— in this, we entirely agree with the ‘pro’ debate article by Gisli Jenkins. In this regard, the efforts of drug companies in developing novel drugs and collaboration with expert clinical investigators in the field of IPF in wanting to demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy for patients w...
متن کاملRelaunching the Pro–Con section at Critical Care
At a recent Editorial Board meeting of Critical Care that was held in conjunction with the International Symposium of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine in Brussels, there was a fairly lively discussion about the Pro–Con section of the journal. Despite data demonstrating that the diverse and provocative Pro–Con debates published over the years have been popular, there was a sense they could ...
متن کاملPro: Should Evidence-Based Medicine Be Used More in Clinical Practice?
When first asked to write the pro side of this debate, I found myself enthusiastically accepting. After all, what possible argument could be found against implementing a more evidence-based approach to one’s clinical practice? Perhaps because of my fervent support of doing so, I found myself having trouble approaching this article. How can one write the pro side to a debate topic when the con s...
متن کاملPRO–CON DEBATE Why I use the pulmonary artery catheter
Crit Care Resuscitation ISSN: 1441-2772 4 September 2006 8 3 252-255 © C r i t C a r e R es u s c i t a t i on 20 06 www.jficm.anzca.edu.au/aaccm/journal/publications.htm Pro–con debate multiple organ dysfunction. Recent Australian Zealand, and European epidemiological st reported unacceptably high mortality rates of 25 sepsis, and confirmed the importance of hae factors. As the risk factors fo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013